Minne and Goldfish — which one is for you?

Of everything Minne gets compared to, Goldfish is the closest. Both are lightweight Mac apps that quietly build a memory of your work and draft from it, in your tone, when you press Option in a text field. Both read the text of your windows through the Accessibility APIs — no screenshots, no screen recording, in Goldfish's case in its own words. Both keep the memory on your machine, auto-generate a browsable wiki from it, and serve it to Claude Desktop over local MCP.

So the choice is not about the idea — it is the same idea. It comes down to three things: who runs the model, what the memory is stored as, and whether you can read the code.

When two tools share an idea, compare their defaults: where the model runs, what format the memory takes, and what you can verify. That is where alike products stop being alike.

What Goldfish does well

From Goldfish's own site and Product Hunt page, checked at the date in the footer:

Where Minne differs

Choose Goldfish if…

Choose Minne if…

It is genuinely pleasing that the closest product to Minne shares its text-not-pixels conviction — the case for that approach applies to both. For what either kind of tool should be measured against, start at what is a personal AI memory?; for the other neighbours, see Minne and OpenHistory — open source, same no-screenshot stance, timeline-shaped — Minne and Elephas and Minne and Raycast AI.

Product facts on this page were checked against each product's own published material on 2026-08-27. Something outdated? Say so and it will be fixed.

Free, open source, and yours to read. macOS 14 and later.